The TP-Link Archer AX3200 is a router that is difficult to come by. This is because of the fact that it is only accessible at Costco, which needs a membership, in the United States. And it proved a fantastic find for certain people, base on my research.
Thinking about that it is a product for a single shop, the TP-Link Archer AX3200 Router is a little unusual. It has a limited set of hardware and does not contain capabilities found in other TP-Link routers, which is a shame. Here’s how it works: If you only want dependable Wi-Fi and nothing more, this tri-band router will meet your needs. It’s a great Wi-Fi 6 broadcaster, specifically considering its cheap price of no more than $200.
But, if you need to get the most out of your network, a general retail version for example the Archer AX50 or Archer AX6000 may be a better option. Additionally, you may choose any of these current best Wi-Fi 6 routers.
Where To Buy TP Link Archer AX3200 Router:
TP-Link Archer AX3200 Router Design
The TP-Link Archer AX3200 is a tri-band Wi-Fi 6 router that is a little underwhelming. In many respects, it reminds me of the Archer AX3000, which was only available at Walmart. Its appearance, however, is completely different, with six non-removable antennae and a casing constructed of strong and toughened plastic.
In spite of this, the Archer AX3200 seems to be a standard router in appearance. The only thing that stands out in terms of design is the color-changing status light located at its “nose.” In fact, many Wi-Fi 5 routers offer even more amazing performance statistics. Such as, the Asus RT-AC88U is an AC3100 router. The TP-Link Archer C5400X, however, offers a total bandwidth of 5400 Megabits.
The TP-Link Archer AX3200 has the bare minimum Wi-Fi 6 specifications that may be found. Each of its 5GHz bands is equipped with two Wi-Fi 6 specifications. But, with no compatibility for the 160MHz channel width, each link is limited to a highest of 1200Mbps. The actual speeds in the real world will be much slower.
In other words, even when looking at the document, TP-Link Archer AX3200 Router is nothing to be concerned about. In spite of the fact that it is a tri-band router, it has less bandwidth than many dual-band equivalents. That takes us to something very intriguing about the network ports on the device.
The TP-Link Archer AX3200 Router is geared up with three Gigabit LAN ports, which is standard for this type of device. What distinguishes it from the competition is the fact that it includes two LAN/WAN ports. One is a Gigabit port, while the other is a multi-gig port with a transfer rate of as high as 2.5 Gbps. These are referred to as LAN/WAN ports since you can only utilize one of them as a WAN port. Select one to be used in this manner, and the other will now function as a LAN port.
However, due to the poor Wi-Fi specifications, the multi-gigabit Ethernet connection will make little impact. When hosting a portable drive, the router also has a USB 3.0 connection, but its small hardware power is insufficient to offer rapid NAS performance because of the limited bandwidth.
TP-Link Archer AX3200 Router Performance.
In light of the router’s hardware specifications, it performed admirably in my tests as a tri-band router. It interested note that it performed better with Wi-Fi 5 clients than it did with my 2 2 Wi-Fi 6 clients.
The Archer AX3200 is equipped with a network interface that can transfer data at the highest speed of its Wi-Fi band. My tests revealed that at a close range of around 10 feet (3 meters), my 22 Wi-Fi 6 clients could actually connect at 1.2 Gbps and maintain a continuous throughput of more than 850Mbps. When it was further away, it averaged around 700Mbps.
Since I utilized the 2.5 Gbps port on the router to connect it to the test server, it is reasonable to claim that the Wi-Fi connection is causing the bottleneck. This is in accordance with my test methodology. As a result, when compared to comparable multi-gigabit read routers, the Archer AX3200 performed the worst. But, its Wi-Fi 6 performance was generally satisfactory. The TP-Link Archer AX3200 Router performed even better when it came to Wi-Fi 5 clients. My 44 Wi-Fi test equipment was able to achieve the negotiated speed of 1.7 Gbps and recorded almost 870Mbps of continuous throughput at a close range. My three consumers each received an average of over 770Mbps from a distance of 40 feet (12 meters).
With a speed of between 100Mbps and 180Mbps on the 2.4 GHz band, the Archer AX3200 performed similarly to the most current router, providing enough data transfer to support a modest Internet connection in its entirety. Generally, the TP-Link Archer AX3200 Router is a fantastic alternative to the AX50 in terms of Wi-Fi performance. The Archer 3200 was comparable to the Archer AX50 and the Asus RT-AX58U when it came to Wi-Fi coverage. If you reside in a house that is 1800 ft2 (167 m2) or less, this router will most likely be sufficient if it is located in the center of the house.
It should be noted that the Wi-Fi range varies considerably depending upon the surroundings, so your results may differ, but the Archer 3200 delivered a dependable performance. There were no difficulties with it throughout my three-day stress test.
Verdict.
To put it another way, the TP-Link Archer AX3200 is a “high-end” router for a family with modest Wi-Fi requirements. It’s a tri-band router that offers the same (if not less) bandwidth as many dual-band routers while also offering a more limited feature set.
However, at a price of less than $200, it is a fantastic router for people who only want a dependable performance and nothing else. If you are such type of user, go ahead and get it; you will not be disappointed with our selection. But, for even more alternatives in terms of performance and functionality, it’s a good idea to also have a look at our list of the best Wi-Fi 6 routers available.
The TP-Link Archer AX3200 is a router that is difficult to come by. Many Wi-Fi 5 routers offer even more amazing performance statistics. Since I utilized the 2.5 Gbps port on the router to connect it to the test server, it is reasonable to claim that the Wi-Fi connection is causing the bottleneck. As a result, when compared to comparable multi-gigabit read routers, the Archer AX3200 performed the worst. When it came to Wi-Fi 5 clients, the router performed even better.
Leave A Comment